AREA REPORT
Vets in Argyll
Prices, reviews and ownership for 5 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Argyll is unusual. Every one of its 5 practices is independently owned, far higher than the national average. Less than a third publish their prices online. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the Competition and Markets Authority is addressing in its review of the veterinary sector. The highest-rated practice is Mull and Iona Vets at 5.0 on Google.
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Who owns vets in Argyll
Ownership breakdown across 5 practices
Argyll vet rankings
5 practices in your area
Kintyre Veterinary Services
Argyll · PA28 6RU
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
No local comparisonNo local comparison
REVIEWS
Very Good
Bute & Cowal Vets
Argyll · PA23 7LT
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Dalriada Veterinary Surgery
Argyll · PA31 8QX
Fair
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Poor
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Mull and Iona Vets
Argyll · PA73 6LT
Fair
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Parklea Veterinary Surgery
Argyll · G84 7RD
Fair
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Common questions about vets in Argyll
Rightvet has indexed 5 vet practices in Argyll. All 5 are independently owned.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Mull and Iona Vets, rated 5.0 out of 5, in Argyll.
Vets in nearby towns
Topic hub
How to choose a vet
What to check when comparing practices on fees, reviews and ownership.
Topic hub
Vet costs guide
Live median fees for consultations, vaccinations, neutering and more.
Topic hub
Who owns UK vets?
How to tell if a practice is independent or part of a larger group.
Research study
Consultation cost research
What a routine appointment typically costs across UK practices.
Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me
See something wrong? Suggest a correction