rightvet.

AREA REPORT

Vets in Burnley

Prices, reviews and ownership for 4 practices

LOCAL OVERVIEW

Burnley has 4 vet practices. Only 1 are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. Around half publish their consultation prices. The highest-rated practice is Oakmount Veterinary Centre Oak Exotics at 4.6 on Google.

4 practices3 in a group1 independent
25%
independent
£49
avg consultation
2
publish prices

Find vets near you

Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing

Or browse all 4 Burnley practices

Who owns vets in Burnley

Ownership breakdown across 4 practices

Independent 1
IVC Evidensia 2
VetPartners 1
Most practices in Burnley are part of larger veterinary groups. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger groups. Here, 3 of 4 are part of larger groups.

Corporate groups

IVC Evidensia
2 practices
Nestlé / EQT / Silver Lake
VetPartners
1 practice
BC Partners

Burnley vet rankings

4 practices in your area

#1

Myerscough Veterinary Group

BB12 8QN·£45 consultation·IVC Evidensia
4.5(133)
#2

Stanley House Veterinary Group

BB10 1EL·£52 consultation·VetPartners
4.6(345)
#3

Oakmount Veterinary Centre Oak Exotics

BB11 1TP·IVC Evidensia
4.6(1,140)
#4

Rose Valley Vets Ltd

BB11 1JG·Independent
4.6(200)

Common questions about vets in Burnley

Rightvet has indexed 4 vet practices in Burnley. 1 are independently owned and 3 are part of larger veterinary groups including IVC Evidensia, VetPartners.
Stanley House Veterinary Group has the highest Rightvet Score of 4.6/5 in Burnley, based on reviews and pricing transparency. The highest-rated practice on Google is Oakmount Veterinary Centre Oak Exotics at 4.6★.

Vets in nearby towns

Vets in Accrington4 practices· avg £58
Vets in Clitheroe4 practices· avg £56
Vets in Bury6 practices· avg £57
Vets in Rochdale8 practices· avg £49
Vets in Blackburn6 practices· avg £52

See something wrong? Suggest a correction

Rightvet Scores combine Google reviews, pricing transparency and emergency preparedness. Methodology →