AREA REPORT
Vets in Cardigan
Prices, reviews and ownership for 3 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Cardigan has 3 vet practices. 2 are independently owned and 0 are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £62 at Priory Vets Cardigan to around £62 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Priory Vets Cardigan at 4.6 on Google.
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
What vets charge in Cardigan
3 cheapest consultations from 3 practices that publish prices
Who owns vets in Cardigan
Ownership breakdown across 3 practices
Cardigan vet rankings
3 practices in your area
Priory Vets Cardigan
Cardigan · SA43 1EW
Excellent
OWNERSHIP
IVC Evidensia (905)
TRANSPARENCY
Excellent
PRICES
Around localAround local avg
REVIEWS
Very Good
Priory Vets
Cardigan · SA43 1DB
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
IVC Evidensia (905)
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
Around localAround local avg
REVIEWS
Very Good
Priory Vets
Cardigan · SA43 1DB
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
IVC Evidensia (905)
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
Around localAround local avg
REVIEWS
Very Good
Common questions about vets in Cardigan
Consultation fees in Cardigan range from £62 to £62. The average across 3 practices that publish their prices is £62. Priory Vets Cardigan offers the lowest published consultation at £62.
Rightvet has indexed 3 vet practices in Cardigan. All 2 are independently owned.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Priory Vets Cardigan, rated 4.6 out of 5, in Cardigan.
Vets in nearby towns
Topic hub
How to choose a vet
What to check when comparing practices on fees, reviews and ownership.
Topic hub
Vet costs guide
Live median fees for consultations, vaccinations, neutering and more.
Topic hub
Who owns UK vets?
How to tell if a practice is independent or part of a larger group.
Research study
Consultation cost research
What a routine appointment typically costs across UK practices.
Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me
See something wrong? Suggest a correction