AREA REPORT
Vets in Dumfriesshire
Prices, reviews and ownership for 5 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Dumfriesshire is unusual. Every one of its 5 practices is independently owned, far higher than the national average. Less than a third publish their prices online. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the Competition and Markets Authority is addressing in its review of the veterinary sector. The highest-rated practice is Bard Vets Ltd at 4.9 on Google.
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Who owns vets in Dumfriesshire
Ownership breakdown across 5 practices
Dumfriesshire vet rankings
5 practices in your area
Condorrat Vets
Dumfriesshire · DG2 0NU
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Good
PRICES
Above localAbove local avg
REVIEWS
Very Good
Dryfe Vets Ltd
Dumfriesshire · DG11 2DG
Good
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Poor
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Bard Vets Ltd
Dumfriesshire · DG1 1JF
Fair
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Firth Veterinary Centre
Dumfriesshire · DG12 6EF
Fair
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Galloway Vets Ltd
Dumfriesshire · DG6 4HX
Fair
OWNERSHIP
Independent
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Excellent
Common questions about vets in Dumfriesshire
Rightvet has indexed 5 vet practices in Dumfriesshire. All 5 are independently owned.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Bard Vets Ltd, rated 4.9 out of 5, in Dumfriesshire.
Vets in nearby towns
Topic hub
How to choose a vet
What to check when comparing practices on fees, reviews and ownership.
Topic hub
Vet costs guide
Live median fees for consultations, vaccinations, neutering and more.
Topic hub
Who owns UK vets?
How to tell if a practice is independent or part of a larger group.
Research study
Consultation cost research
What a routine appointment typically costs across UK practices.
Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me
See something wrong? Suggest a correction