rightvet.

AREA REPORT

Vets in Faversham

Prices, reviews and ownership for 6 practices

LOCAL OVERVIEW

Faversham is unusual. Almost eight in ten practices here are independently owned, far higher than the national average. Consultation fees range from £29 at Lady Dane Veterinary Centre to around £59 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Silver Gate Vets at 5.0 on Google.

6 practices1 in a group5 independent£47 avg consultation
83%
independent
£47
avg consultation
5
publish prices

Find vets near you

Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing

Or browse all 6 Faversham practices

What vets charge in Faversham

5 cheapest consultations from 5 practices that publish prices

1
Lady Dane Veterinary Centre
Large group: IVC Evidensia (905 practices)
£29
4.8/5
2
Silver Gate Vets
Independent practice
£30
3.4/5
3
Swale Barn Vets
Independent practice
£58
4.3/5
4
Medivet Faversham
Large group: Medivet & Partners (361 practices)
£59
4.8/5
5
Faversham Veterinary Clinic
Independent practice
£59
4.0/5

1 practice in Faversham don't publish their consultation prices online. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the CMA veterinary market investigation is addressing.

Who owns vets in Faversham

Ownership breakdown across 6 practices

Independent 5
Medivet 1
Faversham has one of the highest rates of independent vet ownership in the UK. Nationally, around half of all practices are part of larger veterinary groups. Here, only 1 of 6 are part of larger groups.

Larger groups

Medivet
1 practice
CVC Capital Partners

Faversham vet rankings

6 practices in your area

Common questions about vets in Faversham

Vets in nearby towns

Vets in Whitstable6 practices· avg £55
Vets in Canterbury7 practices· avg £51
Vets in Sittingbourne6 practices· avg £50
Vets in Sheerness3 practices· avg £41
Vets in Ashford11 practices· avg £49
Vets in Herne Bay3 practices· avg £53

Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me

See something wrong? Suggest a correction