AREA REPORT
Vets in Nantwich
Prices, reviews and ownership for 3 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Nantwich has 3 vet practices. None are independently owned and most are part of larger veterinary groups. The groups represented here include Medivet and IVC Evidensia. Around half publish their consultation prices. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the Competition and Markets Authority is addressing in its review of the veterinary sector. The highest-rated practice is Leonard Brothers Veterinary Centre Ltd at 4.8 on Google.
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Who owns vets in Nantwich
Ownership breakdown across 3 practices
Larger groups
Nantwich vet rankings
3 practices in your area
Leonard Brothers Veterinary Centre Ltd
Nantwich · CW5 6RT
Exceptional
OWNERSHIP
IVC Evidensia (905)
TRANSPARENCY
Excellent
PRICES
Around localAround local avg
REVIEWS
Excellent
Medivet NantwichHillside Veterinary Centre
Nantwich · CW5 6NB
Excellent
OWNERSHIP
Medivet & Partners (361)
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
Above localAbove local avg
REVIEWS
Excellent
Medivet Nantwich 24 hour (Nantwich Pet Vets)
Nantwich · CW5 5SF
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
Medivet & Partners (361)
TRANSPARENCY
Good
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Very Good
Common questions about vets in Nantwich
Rightvet has indexed 3 vet practices in Nantwich. All 3 are part of larger veterinary groups including Medivet, IVC Evidensia.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Leonard Brothers Veterinary Centre Ltd, rated 4.8 out of 5, in Nantwich.
Vets in nearby towns
Topic hub
How to choose a vet
What to check when comparing practices on fees, reviews and ownership.
Topic hub
Vet costs guide
Live median fees for consultations, vaccinations, neutering and more.
Topic hub
Who owns UK vets?
How to tell if a practice is independent or part of a larger group.
Research study
Consultation cost research
What a routine appointment typically costs across UK practices.
Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me
See something wrong? Suggest a correction