AREA REPORT
Vets in Rhyl
Prices, reviews and ownership for 4 practices
LOCAL OVERVIEW
Rhyl has 4 vet practices. 2 are independently owned and 2 are part of larger veterinary groups. The groups represented here include Animal Trust and Pets at Home. Around half publish their consultation prices. Pricing transparency is one of the issues the Competition and Markets Authority is addressing in its review of the veterinary sector. The highest-rated practice is Caerwys Veterinary Surgery at 4.7 on Google.
Find vets near you
Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing
Who owns vets in Rhyl
Ownership breakdown across 4 practices
Larger groups
Rhyl vet rankings
4 practices in your area
Rhyl Vets4Pets Ltd
Rhyl · LL18 2TJ
Excellent
OWNERSHIP
Pets at Home (474)
TRANSPARENCY
Excellent
PRICES
UnpublishedUnpublished
REVIEWS
Very Good
Animal Trust Vets CIC - Rhyl
Rhyl · LL18 1LR
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Very Good
PRICES
Above localAbove local avg
REVIEWS
Excellent
Caerwys Veterinary Surgery
Rhyl · LL18 2EH
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Good
PRICES
Below localBelow local avg
REVIEWS
Excellent
AllPets Veterinary Clinic Limited
Rhyl · LL18 4BY
Very Good
OWNERSHIP
TRANSPARENCY
Fair
PRICES
Below localBelow local avg
REVIEWS
Very Good
Common questions about vets in Rhyl
Rightvet has indexed 4 vet practices in Rhyl. 2 are independently owned and 2 are part of larger veterinary groups including Animal Trust, Pets at Home.
The highest-rated practice on Google is Caerwys Veterinary Surgery, rated 4.7 out of 5, in Rhyl.
Vets in nearby towns
Topic hub
How to choose a vet
What to check when comparing practices on fees, reviews and ownership.
Topic hub
Vet costs guide
Live median fees for consultations, vaccinations, neutering and more.
Topic hub
Who owns UK vets?
How to tell if a practice is independent or part of a larger group.
Research study
Consultation cost research
What a routine appointment typically costs across UK practices.
Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me
See something wrong? Suggest a correction