rightvet.

AREA REPORT

Vets in Wokingham

Prices, reviews and ownership for 7 practices

LOCAL OVERVIEW

Wokingham has 7 vet practices. 3 are independently owned and 4 are part of larger veterinary groups. Consultation fees range from £55 at St Vincents Veterinary Surgery to around £70 at typical high street vets. Most practices here publish their prices online. The highest-rated practice is Mulberry House Vets at 4.9 on Google.

7 practices4 in a group3 independent£64 avg consultation
43%
independent
£64
avg consultation
7
publish prices

Find vets near you

Enter your postcode for personalised results with distances and local pricing

Or browse all 7 Wokingham practices

What vets charge in Wokingham

7 cheapest consultations from 7 practices that publish prices

1
St Vincents Veterinary Surgery
Independent practice
£55
4.9/5
2
Denton Veterinary Surgery
Independent practice
£57
4.0/5
3
Winnersh Vets4Pets
Joint venture: Pets at Home (474 practices)
£60
4.8/5
4
Mulberry House Vets
Small independent group: Mulberry House Vets (2 practices)
£68
4.6/5
5
Nine Mile Veterinary Group - Emmview
Large group: CVS Vets (400 practices)
£70
4.3/5
6
Nine Mile Veterinary Hospital
Large group: CVS Vets (400 practices)
£70
4.5/5
7
Medivet Wokingham 24 hour Kynoch Vets
Large group: Medivet & Partners (361 practices)
£70
4.3/5

Who owns vets in Wokingham

Ownership breakdown across 7 practices

Independent 3
CVS Group 2
Pets at Home 1
Medivet 1
Wokingham has a mixed market of independent and group practices. 3 of 7 practices are independently owned, roughly in line with the national average.

Larger groups

CVS Group
2 practices
Public (LSE listed)
Pets at Home
1 practice
Pets at Home plc
Medivet
1 practice
CVC Capital Partners

Wokingham vet rankings

7 practices in your area

Common questions about vets in Wokingham

Vets in nearby towns

Vets in Yateley2 practices
Vets in Bracknell5 practices· avg £62
Vets in Fleet3 practices· avg £59
Vets in Reading19 practices· avg £56

Looking for a vet in a different area? Find vets near me

See something wrong? Suggest a correction